In 2006, I made hundreds of calls trying to gather my 1986 graduating class for a 20-year reunion. (Just for fun, I'm tossing in a graduation photo.) I can't even tell you how many times I heard this, "High school? No thanks. I am sooooo over that." And I thought, "Well, so am I. We have all moved on."
It seemed obvious to me that during the years that my peers and I have been separated, ALL of us have changed. Of course, we are not the same people that walked the halls of Taylorsville High School decades ago. Plus, I don't think that we were too bad back then for kids who were just 15 or 16 or 17 years old. Maybe some would say that we were squirrel-y teens with half-connected neurons, but we were trying to grow up good. And with the benefit of years and years, probably (hopefully), we were all even better and improved.
As promised, THS Class of 1986 reunion was a great study of human growth and development over a long period of time. That is, if you are into a kind of scientific anthropology beyond just drinking punch with old friends. ha!
That brings me to today's big thought--
(Cue the confetti canons and fiery sparklers.)
!!!!! People change !!!!!
When you are talking about children of God, yesterday is not today, and today is not tomorrow. We grow. We improve. We develop. We are tutored. We are molded. We are refined.
To quote The Bard, "Twas I, but 'Tis not I" (1), because God is remodeling the human race, one by one and moment to moment.
The central purpose of mortality is the opportunity to grow and reach a greater potential. (2) The changes are gradual and occur over time. Our progress is more a process than an event. (3)
The central figure in that "process" is Jesus Christ, whose divine mission was, in part, to suffer beyond the capacity of a mere mortal and then give His life to save us from our sins. His purpose was to reclaim us through repentance from the inevitable missteps of our probationary time, and then to advocate with the Father on our behalf. To offer us an escape from the condemnation that we earn through acts of independence and agency, and allow us to benefit from the gradual growth and development that failure and/or experience brings.
His purpose is to accomplish in us, a complete metamorphosis-- "The gospel of Jesus Christ...takes...men and women of the earth and refines (them) into men and women for the eternities." (4)
As Paul said, "We look for the Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ: Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body, according to the working whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto himself." (5)
Whew! That is beautiful doctrine and with it in mind--
I am very concerned about a real societal problem that I see popping up all over the place. It is this sweeping ideology that once a person has fallen short, that there is never a way to rid oneself of shortcomings or mistakes, rebellion or agency, weakness or transgression. That they stick like glue. Impossible to shed. And they follow you in perpetuity. (The Information Age makes this more and more possible.)
What a desperate and grim state to believe that our accumulation of daily blemish is with us irrevocably! This is an outright denial of The Atonement of Jesus Christ.
It is a modern-day proliferation of the philosophy of ancient, awful anti-christs.
Sherem "(preached) among the people, ...(declaring) unto them that there should be no Christ." (6)
And Korihor screamed, "...ye cannot know that there shall be a Christ. Ye look forward and say that (you) see a remission of your sins. But behold, it is the effect of a frenzied mind; and this derangement of your minds comes because of the traditions of your fathers, which lead you away into a belief of things which are not so." (7)
We live in a society that denies Heavenly Father's plan to help us grow through line upon line development over a lifetime and more. We live with a collective people who deny that Christ came to offer us an escape from condemnation.
This is my anthem today-- allow others to change!
It is such a bad thing when we deny each another the possibility of the Savior's power to transform us over time. It is especially disconcerting when we appreciate and depend on the liberal mercy of Christ for ourselves, but are restrictive with His grace when we view others.(8) We are all prodigals. We are NOT finished, yet. And we all need Christ.
Here is THE true, hopeful doctrine that allows us to embrace our arduous path and move onward through our mistakes-- Elder Packer taught, “The Atonement leaves no tracks, no traces. What it fixes is fixed. … It just heals, and what it heals stays healed....The Atonement, which can reclaim each one of us, bears no scars. That means that no matter what we have done or where we have been or how something happened, if we truly repent, [the Savior] has promised that He would atone. And when He atoned, that settled that!” (9)
It is my hope that we can apply Elder Packer's declaration to ourselves, but also, liberally to others. Remembering that Heavenly Father started us here on earth as babies in mother's arms needing to learn every single thing new. And believing that every day is an essential opportunity to be building on yesterday, growing and stretching, and recreating ourselves. Christ making that possible.
If we could think of life as "a process" then maybe we could stand back and glory in the cumulative nature of development. Then we would not be in such a dogged hurry with each other's progress. And I don't think that we would hold each other hostage to our pasts either. But instead we would stand in awe, armed with mercy, as we witnessed and even admired God's longitudinal, drip by drip, long-term program of transforming each of us into something more divine.
(1) Shakespeare, "As You Like It"
(2) Mormon.org, What is the Purpose of Life? https://www.mormon.org/beliefs/purpose-of-life
(3) "Born Again" Elder D. Todd Christofferson April 2008 GC
(4) CR Nov 2007 The Great Commandment Elder Joseph B. Wirthlin
(5) Philippians 3:20-21
(6) Jacob 7:1-2
(7) Alma 30:15-16
(8) ideas came from reading Elder Renlund's April 2015 GC talk, "Latter-day Saints Keep on Trying"
(9) Boyd K Packer, “The Plan of Happiness,” Ensign or Liahona, May 2015, 28.
Tuesday, September 25, 2018
Tuesday, September 11, 2018
A Nation of God's Children
This is a little throwback to September of 2011. It is a photo of corporate-Greg as he was leaving for the airport for his first American Airlines flight post 9-11. He left without fear.
Me? Skiddish. That's why there is a picture. I wanted some kind of "last memory" if things went eschew. Sweet Jamison is the baby.
That was quite a season in the history of our country and I felt affected even from our innocent little world of Frisco, Texas. By affected, I mean, vulnerable.
I was grateful for leaders who jumped into action to protect me. It reminds me that last week I heard Brett Kavanaugh (presently of the DC Court of Appeals) remembering his five and a half years in the George Bush White House. He said that for President Bush, every day post 9-11 was September 12th and he was consummately determined to keep America safe. At the time, I felt secure in that. I sensed that for the next 2686 days, Bush had my back.
I also had profound feelings of patriotism for this great nation that I love. After 9-11 we embraced in the great biggest National hug ever.
I remember watching the broadcast of the September 14th Prayer Service in the DC National Cathedral and I felt like America was all gathered for comfort and strength from The Heavens. It was beautiful. The Nation, collectively, needed a Supreme Being during that season to make sense of the senseless. They needed to put their faith in someone loving and powerful and omnipotent.
In that meeting, President Bush said this:
"It is said that adversity introduces us to ourselves. This is true of a nation as well. In this trial, we have been reminded, and the world has seen, that our fellow Americans are generous and kind, resourceful and brave...Today we feel what Franklin Roosevelt called 'the warm courage of national unity'. This is a unity of every faith and every background."
And that was the week that Congress shook off their differences, squished together, and with "heart eyes" for each other, sang "God Bless America" on the United States Capital steps" while we all watched. What an amazing scene.
It would be nice if that was the climate of our nation today, but we have been so casual with the unity that we found in tragedy.
Last week, I was obsessively interested in the Senate's public confirmation process of the above mentioned Supreme Court nominee, Judge Kavanaugh. I watched a lot of the two days of questioning and came away confident that the Judge was beyond qualified. This is a good man. This is a man committed to the rules of the Judiciary. He respects precedent. He is principled. He is a willing servant. His twelve years on the bench has shown intelligence, lack of bias, respect for the Constitution, and for those in his courtroom. Like Senator Lindsay Graham said, he should be confirmed with 96 or 97 or 98 votes. But that is just not the way things work in Washington these days.
I'm not sure whether our politicians set the tone for us as Americans, or if they go to DC to represent us in our bias. But chicken or egg, cooperation and courtesy is not the way we play. Those Senate hearings last week were a peek into the ugly and the wedges and the cliques and the selfish and the destructive and the bitter.
And that's why it isn't all bad to have 9-11 come around the corner again. It is a day of remembering the victims and their loved ones, yes. But we would be obliged if it was more than that. If the day was also an opportunity to remember when love combined against hate. When solidarity reigned and, as a nation, we were one.
If we all remembered those feelings then maybe we would require benevolence of ourselves, and of our public servants again. And if we could hold it close, I bet we would sigh at how glorious it felt to be joined and connected again-- all of us God's children, placed here together in this brilliant and beautiful land of liberty and love.
Me? Skiddish. That's why there is a picture. I wanted some kind of "last memory" if things went eschew. Sweet Jamison is the baby.
That was quite a season in the history of our country and I felt affected even from our innocent little world of Frisco, Texas. By affected, I mean, vulnerable.
I was grateful for leaders who jumped into action to protect me. It reminds me that last week I heard Brett Kavanaugh (presently of the DC Court of Appeals) remembering his five and a half years in the George Bush White House. He said that for President Bush, every day post 9-11 was September 12th and he was consummately determined to keep America safe. At the time, I felt secure in that. I sensed that for the next 2686 days, Bush had my back.
I also had profound feelings of patriotism for this great nation that I love. After 9-11 we embraced in the great biggest National hug ever.
I remember watching the broadcast of the September 14th Prayer Service in the DC National Cathedral and I felt like America was all gathered for comfort and strength from The Heavens. It was beautiful. The Nation, collectively, needed a Supreme Being during that season to make sense of the senseless. They needed to put their faith in someone loving and powerful and omnipotent.
In that meeting, President Bush said this:
"It is said that adversity introduces us to ourselves. This is true of a nation as well. In this trial, we have been reminded, and the world has seen, that our fellow Americans are generous and kind, resourceful and brave...Today we feel what Franklin Roosevelt called 'the warm courage of national unity'. This is a unity of every faith and every background."
And that was the week that Congress shook off their differences, squished together, and with "heart eyes" for each other, sang "God Bless America" on the United States Capital steps" while we all watched. What an amazing scene.
It would be nice if that was the climate of our nation today, but we have been so casual with the unity that we found in tragedy.
Last week, I was obsessively interested in the Senate's public confirmation process of the above mentioned Supreme Court nominee, Judge Kavanaugh. I watched a lot of the two days of questioning and came away confident that the Judge was beyond qualified. This is a good man. This is a man committed to the rules of the Judiciary. He respects precedent. He is principled. He is a willing servant. His twelve years on the bench has shown intelligence, lack of bias, respect for the Constitution, and for those in his courtroom. Like Senator Lindsay Graham said, he should be confirmed with 96 or 97 or 98 votes. But that is just not the way things work in Washington these days.
I'm not sure whether our politicians set the tone for us as Americans, or if they go to DC to represent us in our bias. But chicken or egg, cooperation and courtesy is not the way we play. Those Senate hearings last week were a peek into the ugly and the wedges and the cliques and the selfish and the destructive and the bitter.
And that's why it isn't all bad to have 9-11 come around the corner again. It is a day of remembering the victims and their loved ones, yes. But we would be obliged if it was more than that. If the day was also an opportunity to remember when love combined against hate. When solidarity reigned and, as a nation, we were one.
If we all remembered those feelings then maybe we would require benevolence of ourselves, and of our public servants again. And if we could hold it close, I bet we would sigh at how glorious it felt to be joined and connected again-- all of us God's children, placed here together in this brilliant and beautiful land of liberty and love.
Friday, June 15, 2018
We Believe in Fathers
I had a wonderful mother. She was as intentional as any I have ever seen. She had a bachelor's degree in Human Development and Family Relations and her greatest ambition was to raise a family and make a lovely home. She served home-cooked meals with vegetables, read us Caldecott Award-winning books, spoke to us with respect and love, pushed us to set goals, sewed us matching dresses, kissed us on the head, and taught us how to work. She was !good! at her profession.
My Dad tells me that he was impressed with and grateful for her capacity, talent and efficiency with the home and children. Working in tandem, he knew he had a role as a provider and a spiritual guider, but beyond that, he didn't exactly know what it was that he contributed to our family life, especially the child-rearing.
One day, my dad had a young 40-something year old heart attack. After some days of hospitalization, he was visited by my oldest sister, Alison. She encouraged him to get better, "Hurry! We need you at home!" She told him that things were kind of chaotic without him.
My dad tells me that that plea from a teen-age daughter was insight into family influence that he hadn't before recognized completely. "I learned that I was a stabilizing force for our family. That I was steady, kept things positive, and on even-keel emotionally." To this day, he gets a little teary when he tells this story because it was such an important lesson for him to learn-- even with a capable mother, our family needed HIM!
I agree with my sisters long-ago assessment, families need fathers. I needed my dad's kind encouragement, his predictable reactions, his weakness for spoiling this daughter. I needed his wise, measured counsel, his Gospel instruction, and his pillow fights. I needed LeGrande Richards read out loud to me, regular scripture study, and his kind, approving looks. I needed to play hide and seek with him, even though we knew he would always be found in the bathtub. I needed his example of hard work and sacrifice, the use of his beat-up pick up truck, and his kneeling prayers at dinner time. I needed more than provisions, I needed a father in the deepest most sacred use of that word.
"We believe in fathers. We believe in 'the ideal of the man' who puts his family first...We believe that far from being superfluous, fathers are unique and irreplaceable."
I recently listened to a BYU-I devotional spoken by a Child Development/Marriage and Family Studies professor, Tim Rarick. He taught me that a man hasn't even really been introduced to their potential and life's mission until they have prepared for, embraced, and then magnified their role as a father. His words corrected the perception that success in church service, societal influence, and bread-winning completely meet the requirements that God has for men. He said, "sometimes I think that we ...speak of wanting to become like our Heavenly Father by developing His knowledge and perfect attributes, without focusing on becoming what He is: a parent—more specifically, a father." (2)
Brother Rarick quoted the Church's manual titled 'A Parent’s Guide': “Since a major purpose of our mortal existence is to become like our Heavenly Father…the ultimate goal of a man or boy is to become an effective husband and father..." (3) Then He concluded, "(Fatherhood) is how men reach the full measure of their creation. Brethren, if your goal is exaltation, your goal is fatherhood." (4)
"If your goal is exaltation, your goal is fatherhood"-- this is amazing doctrine.
This is not a statement of biology, this is a clarion call for men to rise to the role of being an intentional, focused parent.
Perhaps we focus too much on the father's responsibilities outside of the home. Is he a resource-gatherer? A family provider? Yes. Emphatically. In fact Elder Christofferson stated, "Jesus said, “Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.” Fathers manifest that love as they lay down their lives day by day, laboring in the service and support of their families." (5) Isn't that beautiful! And does a father have duties in God's Kingdom? Yes. Absolutely. He bears the Priesthood and serves to bring people to Christ through ordinances and covenants. But, a man's development, even in all of the good he does elsewhere, is incomplete until he embraces being a father. Until he lets the experiences of caring for children, in their weakness and complexity, become his passion. His development opportunity. His life's purpose.
These couple of weeks between mid-May and mid-June where we celebrate motherhood and fatherhood, are an annual, respectful bow to the two most influential roles that a human could ever play. If the families of the world were led by women who were singularly-focused, purposed mothers, and by men who were were taking care of their families physical needs and were involved fathers, then !ta da! many of the societal ills that plague us today would find resolution.
Yes, we believe in fathers and fatherhood. We believe in the strength, goodness and worth of men. We believe in their invaluable contribution to families. Kudos to the great men on this earth.
Happy Father's Day!
(1) Fathers, D Todd Christofferson, Apr 2016 GC
(2) "Men Are That They Might Be Fathers", Tim Rarick, BYU-I Devotional, May 18, 2018
(3) A Parent’s Guide (manual, 1985); lds.org.
(4) "Men Are That They Might Be Fathers", Tim Rarick, BYU-I Devotional, May 18, 2018
(5) Fathers, D Todd Christofferson, Apr 2016 GC
My Dad tells me that he was impressed with and grateful for her capacity, talent and efficiency with the home and children. Working in tandem, he knew he had a role as a provider and a spiritual guider, but beyond that, he didn't exactly know what it was that he contributed to our family life, especially the child-rearing.
One day, my dad had a young 40-something year old heart attack. After some days of hospitalization, he was visited by my oldest sister, Alison. She encouraged him to get better, "Hurry! We need you at home!" She told him that things were kind of chaotic without him.
My dad tells me that that plea from a teen-age daughter was insight into family influence that he hadn't before recognized completely. "I learned that I was a stabilizing force for our family. That I was steady, kept things positive, and on even-keel emotionally." To this day, he gets a little teary when he tells this story because it was such an important lesson for him to learn-- even with a capable mother, our family needed HIM!
I agree with my sisters long-ago assessment, families need fathers. I needed my dad's kind encouragement, his predictable reactions, his weakness for spoiling this daughter. I needed his wise, measured counsel, his Gospel instruction, and his pillow fights. I needed LeGrande Richards read out loud to me, regular scripture study, and his kind, approving looks. I needed to play hide and seek with him, even though we knew he would always be found in the bathtub. I needed his example of hard work and sacrifice, the use of his beat-up pick up truck, and his kneeling prayers at dinner time. I needed more than provisions, I needed a father in the deepest most sacred use of that word.
"We believe in fathers. We believe in 'the ideal of the man' who puts his family first...We believe that far from being superfluous, fathers are unique and irreplaceable."
I recently listened to a BYU-I devotional spoken by a Child Development/Marriage and Family Studies professor, Tim Rarick. He taught me that a man hasn't even really been introduced to their potential and life's mission until they have prepared for, embraced, and then magnified their role as a father. His words corrected the perception that success in church service, societal influence, and bread-winning completely meet the requirements that God has for men. He said, "sometimes I think that we ...speak of wanting to become like our Heavenly Father by developing His knowledge and perfect attributes, without focusing on becoming what He is: a parent—more specifically, a father." (2)
Brother Rarick quoted the Church's manual titled 'A Parent’s Guide': “Since a major purpose of our mortal existence is to become like our Heavenly Father…the ultimate goal of a man or boy is to become an effective husband and father..." (3) Then He concluded, "(Fatherhood) is how men reach the full measure of their creation. Brethren, if your goal is exaltation, your goal is fatherhood." (4)
"If your goal is exaltation, your goal is fatherhood"-- this is amazing doctrine.
This is not a statement of biology, this is a clarion call for men to rise to the role of being an intentional, focused parent.
Perhaps we focus too much on the father's responsibilities outside of the home. Is he a resource-gatherer? A family provider? Yes. Emphatically. In fact Elder Christofferson stated, "Jesus said, “Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.” Fathers manifest that love as they lay down their lives day by day, laboring in the service and support of their families." (5) Isn't that beautiful! And does a father have duties in God's Kingdom? Yes. Absolutely. He bears the Priesthood and serves to bring people to Christ through ordinances and covenants. But, a man's development, even in all of the good he does elsewhere, is incomplete until he embraces being a father. Until he lets the experiences of caring for children, in their weakness and complexity, become his passion. His development opportunity. His life's purpose.
These couple of weeks between mid-May and mid-June where we celebrate motherhood and fatherhood, are an annual, respectful bow to the two most influential roles that a human could ever play. If the families of the world were led by women who were singularly-focused, purposed mothers, and by men who were were taking care of their families physical needs and were involved fathers, then !ta da! many of the societal ills that plague us today would find resolution.
Yes, we believe in fathers and fatherhood. We believe in the strength, goodness and worth of men. We believe in their invaluable contribution to families. Kudos to the great men on this earth.
Happy Father's Day!
(1) Fathers, D Todd Christofferson, Apr 2016 GC
(2) "Men Are That They Might Be Fathers", Tim Rarick, BYU-I Devotional, May 18, 2018
(3) A Parent’s Guide (manual, 1985); lds.org.
(4) "Men Are That They Might Be Fathers", Tim Rarick, BYU-I Devotional, May 18, 2018
(5) Fathers, D Todd Christofferson, Apr 2016 GC
Friday, May 11, 2018
Happy Mother's Day!
Kneeling at the bedside of my boys in the late evening is one of my very favorite places to be. Tucked in their blankets, they are spongy and smart, teachable and cute. Over the years we have read a whole library full of books out loud.
Near President's Day I have pulled out an old $1.48 copy of Abraham Lincoln: President for the People by Larry Weinberg. I love Mr. Weinberg's writing about Abe's childhood.
Abe and his sister were the third generation of Lincolns who lived quite primitively in the forests of Kentucky and then Indiana. The Lincoln cabin, which had a dirt floor and drafty spaces in between the logs, was their frontier home. Abe was nine years old when his mother died of milk disease. His father, Tom, was sad. After harvest was over, Tom left the kids in the custody of a 17 year old orphan boy, and without explanation, headed through the woods. The children, aged 9 and 11, foraged for food and lived lean for weeks and weeks as winter set in. When Tom returned in December, he brought a new mother and three new siblings.
The author described the first meeting of the new family, "The youngsters standing in front of the new Mrs. Lincoln were filthy. But she opened her heart to them at once and took them into her arms as if they were her own. Like her own children, they were soon well-scrubbed, well-fed, and wearing clean clothes... But Mrs Lincoln cared about much more...Sarah saw Abe's curiosity and desire to learn and (gave him opportunities at education), and also enough confidence in himself to last him all his life. Even when he became a famous politician (He said), 'All that I am or hope to be, I owe to my angel mother.'"
This sweet little boy needed an advocate, a cheerleader, a director, a nurturer, stability and an opportunity. This, so that he could blossom into the man of faith, strength, brilliance, and distinction that became the Abraham Lincoln that we, generations later, are still so incredibly thankful for.
So, this weekend is Mother's Day and everyone, in increments of cards and flowers, is thankful. But outside of this annual celebration, a mother's value isn't every day understood. It is a very restless world we live in. Societal philosophy has blanketed us with questions about our worth, has stripped us of traditional roles, thrown us into a game of comparison and a search for "equality", has told us to be discontented, and even has made us a little ferocious as we collectively seek for powerful and visible ways to influence. With all of these unsettling messages, we could wonder and question whether mothering, one by one, to a very small audience, is where we can make the our life's greatest contribution.
Thank heavens for Julie Beck who once pointed out, “I think sometimes people confuse stardom with influence." (1) I might rephrase that to say, we confuse "visibility and promotion" with influence. We might believe that in order to have sway and affect in this world, we need to be out in front, loud, picketing, leading a crowd, speaking from a pulpit with a large audience, rocking a board room, running a business, or getting awards and raises. But Julie Beck said, and I would concur, that influence isn't always connected to visibility or "stardom".
A mother marches along quietly and usually without accolades and fanfare. But don't mistake that for lack of influence. Joseph F. Smith once explained, "...(children) drink into the spirit of their mothers, and the influence of the mother over the children is the most enduring impression that can be made. There is nothing so imperishable as the influence of the mother." (2)
Sometimes it may be a little hard to see your own significance, which makes the work faith-based, but children love and trust and quote their mothers. I have driven a lot of carpools, have taught youth classes, and have had a lot of little visitors in my home. From my interaction with children, this I know-- what mothers teach and say and do shape the lens by which children see themselves and how they see the world. This makes me feel very careful. Every president and king, plumber and architect has a mother. Every single, big something is done by someone's well-cared for, enabled, loved, grown up, little child. A mother is one of the kindest gifts that God could give.
A woman's influence may start with just one little person, but it grows and spreads exponentially. Joseph F Smith said, "The...influence (of) a good mother...is like leaven cast into the measure of meal, that will leaven the whole lump... her influence extends, not only to her own children but to the associates of her children. You do not know how far your influence extends. A mother....sows the seeds...and wherever that boy or girl goes, in whatever society they mingle, the good effects of... that mother will be felt." (3)
That quote describes perfectly "The Sarah Lincoln Effect". Her stewardship was, first, a boy of hidden promise, and then a fine man and community lawyer. Eventually her charge was a President of an unsettled, divided America. Her "fruit" is the nation we live in today. She created the possibility for this man, and we all sit indebted to this almost anonymous woman, who cared about a filthy, hungry little boy. Who helped him read and gave him the opportunity of education. Who loved him, taught him, cared for him, and believed in him. That is influence that is known to almost no one but the God of Heaven, but He must be so very grateful for Mrs. Sarah Lincoln. (4)
And may I add, He is grateful for YOU! Because you are doing the same work.
A terrible modern-day miss is in not seeing that a woman's greatest power to influence comes from within family relationships. It is worth all of a woman's resources because the time, talent and energy spent therein goes forward into eternity. A child is an investment in something that is completely unbound by the world. Mothering is influence that never ends.
Happy, Happy Mother's Day. I love and admire you so much.
Mother on!
--Valerie
1- Julie B Beck, General Relief Society President, 2012 Interview with LDS Living
2- Deseret News: Semi-Weekly, 5 Jan. 1892, 3.
3- Deseret News: Semi-Weekly, 5 Jan. 1892, 3.
4- Photo by Bryan Eaton, http://coloroflincoln.com/Parents.html
Near President's Day I have pulled out an old $1.48 copy of Abraham Lincoln: President for the People by Larry Weinberg. I love Mr. Weinberg's writing about Abe's childhood.
Abe and his sister were the third generation of Lincolns who lived quite primitively in the forests of Kentucky and then Indiana. The Lincoln cabin, which had a dirt floor and drafty spaces in between the logs, was their frontier home. Abe was nine years old when his mother died of milk disease. His father, Tom, was sad. After harvest was over, Tom left the kids in the custody of a 17 year old orphan boy, and without explanation, headed through the woods. The children, aged 9 and 11, foraged for food and lived lean for weeks and weeks as winter set in. When Tom returned in December, he brought a new mother and three new siblings.
The author described the first meeting of the new family, "The youngsters standing in front of the new Mrs. Lincoln were filthy. But she opened her heart to them at once and took them into her arms as if they were her own. Like her own children, they were soon well-scrubbed, well-fed, and wearing clean clothes... But Mrs Lincoln cared about much more...Sarah saw Abe's curiosity and desire to learn and (gave him opportunities at education), and also enough confidence in himself to last him all his life. Even when he became a famous politician (He said), 'All that I am or hope to be, I owe to my angel mother.'"
This sweet little boy needed an advocate, a cheerleader, a director, a nurturer, stability and an opportunity. This, so that he could blossom into the man of faith, strength, brilliance, and distinction that became the Abraham Lincoln that we, generations later, are still so incredibly thankful for.
So, this weekend is Mother's Day and everyone, in increments of cards and flowers, is thankful. But outside of this annual celebration, a mother's value isn't every day understood. It is a very restless world we live in. Societal philosophy has blanketed us with questions about our worth, has stripped us of traditional roles, thrown us into a game of comparison and a search for "equality", has told us to be discontented, and even has made us a little ferocious as we collectively seek for powerful and visible ways to influence. With all of these unsettling messages, we could wonder and question whether mothering, one by one, to a very small audience, is where we can make the our life's greatest contribution.
Thank heavens for Julie Beck who once pointed out, “I think sometimes people confuse stardom with influence." (1) I might rephrase that to say, we confuse "visibility and promotion" with influence. We might believe that in order to have sway and affect in this world, we need to be out in front, loud, picketing, leading a crowd, speaking from a pulpit with a large audience, rocking a board room, running a business, or getting awards and raises. But Julie Beck said, and I would concur, that influence isn't always connected to visibility or "stardom".
A mother marches along quietly and usually without accolades and fanfare. But don't mistake that for lack of influence. Joseph F. Smith once explained, "...(children) drink into the spirit of their mothers, and the influence of the mother over the children is the most enduring impression that can be made. There is nothing so imperishable as the influence of the mother." (2)
Sometimes it may be a little hard to see your own significance, which makes the work faith-based, but children love and trust and quote their mothers. I have driven a lot of carpools, have taught youth classes, and have had a lot of little visitors in my home. From my interaction with children, this I know-- what mothers teach and say and do shape the lens by which children see themselves and how they see the world. This makes me feel very careful. Every president and king, plumber and architect has a mother. Every single, big something is done by someone's well-cared for, enabled, loved, grown up, little child. A mother is one of the kindest gifts that God could give.
A woman's influence may start with just one little person, but it grows and spreads exponentially. Joseph F Smith said, "The...influence (of) a good mother...is like leaven cast into the measure of meal, that will leaven the whole lump... her influence extends, not only to her own children but to the associates of her children. You do not know how far your influence extends. A mother....sows the seeds...and wherever that boy or girl goes, in whatever society they mingle, the good effects of... that mother will be felt." (3)
That quote describes perfectly "The Sarah Lincoln Effect". Her stewardship was, first, a boy of hidden promise, and then a fine man and community lawyer. Eventually her charge was a President of an unsettled, divided America. Her "fruit" is the nation we live in today. She created the possibility for this man, and we all sit indebted to this almost anonymous woman, who cared about a filthy, hungry little boy. Who helped him read and gave him the opportunity of education. Who loved him, taught him, cared for him, and believed in him. That is influence that is known to almost no one but the God of Heaven, but He must be so very grateful for Mrs. Sarah Lincoln. (4)
And may I add, He is grateful for YOU! Because you are doing the same work.
A terrible modern-day miss is in not seeing that a woman's greatest power to influence comes from within family relationships. It is worth all of a woman's resources because the time, talent and energy spent therein goes forward into eternity. A child is an investment in something that is completely unbound by the world. Mothering is influence that never ends.
Happy, Happy Mother's Day. I love and admire you so much.
Mother on!
--Valerie
1- Julie B Beck, General Relief Society President, 2012 Interview with LDS Living
2- Deseret News: Semi-Weekly, 5 Jan. 1892, 3.
3- Deseret News: Semi-Weekly, 5 Jan. 1892, 3.
4- Photo by Bryan Eaton, http://coloroflincoln.com/Parents.html
Monday, February 26, 2018
A Call For the Resurgence of Family--
I read a news release last week about Alaina
Petty, a 14 year old who died in the Parkland, Florida shooting on February 14,
2018. This quote from Alaina's Dad, Ryan, is just exactly where my head
has been for eleven days.
"While grief-stricken over Alaina’s death, Ryan Petty said of
the accused gunman, 'I’m not angry at the shooter. I feel like we, as a
society, failed this young man. He did not have the opportunity to live in a
family that could love him the way he needed to be loved; to take care of him and
understand the challenges and emotions he was feeling, and to give him positive
ways to deal with them.' Loving families, he added, are often remedies to
such challenges. 'I can’t help but think that the solutions to these types
of problems don’t lie in the policy realm—they lie in having strong families
that [care] for their children and live according to Heavenly Father’s plan.'” (1)
As society tries to
understand this senseless event, they are suggesting solutions like gun
control, increased school security, teachers with protection responsibilities,
and more cops on campuses. They blame the sheriff, the FBI, The
President, or the NRA.
I really can't evaluate well
the merits or weakness of any of those ideas. That is for people smarter than
me. But, I know that there is something powerful that we can collectively
do. My idea is Ryan Petty's idea-- we
need functional, child-centric families.
Our Families Are Broken
As a society, we are broken.
* Almost half of US babies are born to unwed mothers. And,
the numbers are substantially higher in certain demographics. (2)
* Only 50% of children live with two parents. And 17 million
children live with their mother, but no father. (3)
* There were 8.5 million single mothers in the US in 2016. (4)
* 70% of women with children under 18 years old participate in the
workforce. (5)
* 40-50% of marriages in the US will end in divorce. (6)
* 45% of US households are "unmarried households".
(7)
* About 38 % of unmarried but cohabitating couples have a child
under age 18 living with them. (8)
* Only 7% of households with children are "traditional"—where
one parent works and one stays home. (9)
Children Need Families
Expert in human development, Erik Erickson (1902-1994), taught
about the development of healthy persons. (10) His research has been long-held as a
standard.
He speaks to the developmental stages of a child:
Trust vs. Mistrust 0 - 1½ years old
Autonomy vs. Shame 1½ - 3 years old
Initiative vs. Guilt 3 - 5 years old
Industry vs. Inferiority 5 - 12 years
old
Identity vs. Role Confusion 12 - 18 years
old
Yet, starting at six weeks old, as soon as maternity leave is
over, 61% of American children spend most of their waking hours in
"non-parental" care-- 33% of those in "non-relative
care". That equates to 12.5 million children in daycares or
being cared for by a non-parent, and this is during the season of a child's
life when they are developing trust, autonomy, and initiative. (11)
Preschool outside the home is the norm for American children. 40%
of four year olds are in government-funded preschools. Add the millions
of preschoolers that attend non-publically funded schools and the number rises. (12)
People argue that it is inequity and
injustice that the number is not 100% of children being educated in preschools
outside of their mothers care. They are asking "Why does America
invest so little in their children?" (13)
This is flawed on several levels.
First, it assumes that academic development is the highest societal priority
for children ages three to five years old. After studying Erik Erickson,
I would argue that it is, instead, emotional development that is of top
importance during those years. And second, mandatory preschool assumes
that a mother can not do what educators and babysitters can.
I learned about Erickson’s ideas as a single, young-adult, college
student. I was so impressed at how very important a child’s very first days and
months and years were in becoming a healthy adult. I remember thinking, “A mother gets but one
chance at influencing this. You can not get those important years back. ”
Further, the most well-known and influential theory of cognitive
development was set forth by Jean Piaget (1896-1980). (14) He taught that there are four cognitive stages
of childhood development, he identified them as:
Sensorimotor (birth through about 2 years)- Children
learn about the world through their senses and the manipulation of objects.
Preoperational (ages 2 through 7)- Children develop
memory and imagination. They are also able to understand things symbolically,
and to understand the ideas of past and future.
Concrete Operational (ages 7 through 11)- During this stage,
children become more aware of external events, as well as feelings other than
their own. They become less egocentric, and begin to understand that not
everyone shares their thoughts, beliefs, or feelings.
Formal Operations (ages 11 and older)- During this stage,
children are able to use logic to solve problems, view the world around them,
and plan for the future.
Jean Piaget taught that school age children are trying to figure
out their own feelings and others' feelings and beliefs. They are
learning to look beyond themselves and understand others. They are
working on the skills of becoming empathetic and compassionate. They are
thinking about their own place in the world and where they belong in relation
to others. They are working on the cognitive skills to problem solve and
plan for their future. And yet, 15.1 million children, five to fourteen years
old, spend after school hours alone-- including a full third of American middle
schoolers. And another 6.5 million (a 2004 number and it was on the
rise), are in non-parental, after-school care. (15)
The thought that a child can raise himself or that public schools
and government are best equipt to raise a child, is irresponsible. This
is a whole new progressive take on the old African proverb, "It Takes a
Village to Raise a Child". I believe that that phrase originally
suggested that children need intentional and present parents, but also benefit
from many loving and caring helper-people. But in all of the talk about
the power of accessory supporters, we have lost this truth—first and foremost, it
takes a mother, and a father to raise a child.
I am not critical of skilled, loving providers, nor hard-working
single parents, but the facts are there. For half a century, many of our
children have been either raised by helpers, part-time parents, or have been
alone in their development. I think that we are finding out that that model
does not work.
Children need quality and quantity time from parents. They need
someone to listen and process ideas with. They need a check and balance
system, accountability, rules and expectations. And this should be
executed by someone who loves unconditionally and will parent
individually. They need an environment where they can be honest and
vulnerable, and have someone to talk to who cares about them deeply and can
help them through struggle. They need modeling. They need a reliable schedule and
structure. They need downtime and playtime. They need space to make
mistakes where they can be urged and taught and redirected with love and
mercy. They need correction and oversight. They need mealtime and
bedtime. They need family touch-- hugs and kisses and compliments.
These opportunities do not come at predictable, scheduled moments
or when it is most convenient for a parent. Kids are funny-- they learn when
they want to learn, not when you want to teach them. (16)
Perceptions Have Shifted
Adult roles have been under attack for decades. Over the past fifty years the trend away from
traditional "Father Knows Best" and "Leave it to Beaver"
family has drifted to a society that focuses on the needs of adults, and not of
children.
Woman's liberation movements of the 1960's redefined marriage and
mothering. Robert Sheaffer wrote, “One can try to argue that the U.S.
family died of natural causes at precisely the same time feminists began
shooting at it, but after examining the depth and ferocity of the feminist
attack against women’s roles as wives and mothers, such an argument fails to
convince”. (17) He asserts that
women, themselves, injured mothering and marriage. This because feminism heavily
values personal development and personal contribution over family. It sees less value in helping husbands and
children to have order, security, and nurturing.
Along with the demise of woman's roles, there has been a
degradation of father and manhood. David Blankenhorn, the author of
"Fatherless America", observed: "Fatherless is the most harmful
demographic trend of this generation. It is the leading cause of declining
child well-being in our society. It is also the engine driving our most urgent
social problems." (18) Men have
given up and/or been forced to relinquish the protective, providing, supportive
role that they have long held.
Neal Maxwell once said, “…by reversals and renunciations of role(s),
we make a wasteland of both womanhood and manhood.” (19)
The Blueprint for Successful Families
The blueprint for improving society is The Family
Proclamation. This one page humankind-stabilizing document was delivered by
President Gordon B Hinckley, former prophet of The Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints. (20) The document,
first publically read in 1995, was distributed far and worldwide to Heads of
State, Kings and Queens, Parliaments, and Government Officials.
It declared that each of us are children of God and have
"divine nature and destiny". That "gender is
eternal". That marriage is God's, and is between a man and woman.
That each have equally important, God-given roles that they fulfill with the
love and support of one another. A father is to provide, preside and
protect, and a mother is to nurture and minister. Both with full attention
and intention. Together, side by side, they run a home and family that is full
of faith, love, forgiveness, teaching, activities and respect. A child is to
honor and obey. The family's purpose is assist heaven in "returning"
God's children back to Him.
This document reaffirmed roles and called on adults to refocus on marriage,
home and family. I believe that it
called on parents to “come home” in their hearts and minds, in body and in soul,
and see their greatest contribution to society as the work that they do within
the family.
And while there is no guarantee that children will use their free
will and agency to immediately follow even the most beautiful of parental love,
modeling and teaching. And while a
functional family is not a guarantee that children will be free of organic dysfunction
and imperfection, I would still bank on family.
Why? Because, this I know for
sure, reclaiming a child who has diverted or been difficult, or nurturing a
child who has illness or disability is best accomplished through patient
intervention, love, compassion, urging and nurturing from a family. Where
our hand-wringing, justice-driven society fails, over time, families succeed. Intentional families win.
The Family Proclamation concludes with this warning voice: "We
warn that the disintegration of the family will bring upon individuals,
communities, and nations the calamities foretold by ancient and modern
prophets." (21)
What Can We Do?
It has been said that “a very large
ship is benefited very much by a very small helm in the time of a storm”. (22)
Humankind is a “very large ship” and society
is in a raging “storm”. To produce communities filled to the brim
with functioning, loving, child-centric families is a seemingly “very small helm” and a one by one
effort. But I believe that that societal change can shift
the trajectory and
bring wonderful, sweeping changes to our nation and world.
References and Notes:
12-(https://www2.ed.gov/documents/early-learning/matter-equity-preschool-america.pdf)
16- Clayton Christensen, The Power of
Everyday Missionaries (2012) page 30.
17-("Feminism, the Noble Lie", as
quoted in https://www.thetrumpet.com/2384-how-feminism-harms-families)
18-(David Blankenhorn, Fatherless America:
Confronting Our Most Urgent Social Problem (1995), 62.)
19-Elder Maxwell Quote
20-(The Family Proclamation, September 23,
1995, lds.org)
21-(The Family Proclamation, September 23,
1995, lds.org)
22- Doctrine and Covenants 123:16
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





