Mr Neufeld asserted that formal “early learning”, like pre-school, does not help children and that they should start attending school later, not earlier. He said that, “Early learning programs (like letters and numbers) for young children have no benefits for kids", and that the focus instead needs to be strong attachment and security. He said that "...the capacity for healthy relationships is meant to unfold in the first six years of life." He continued, “By the fifth year of life, if everything (has been) continuous and safe (for the child), then healthy emotional intimacy begins. ...The first issue (in raising a child) is always to establish strong, deep emotional connections with those who are raising you. And that should be our emphasis in society.”
Mr Neufeld debunks pre-school claims of the merits of socialization and diversity and detachment. He says that the stress of timelines and deadlines and schedules are "crushing the spirit of childhood" and are asking our kids to adopt the stresses of adulthood from the cradle. His professional opinion is that children should spend zero through the fifth year with the person who will raise them. The focus should be on establishing a deep, personal, emotional connection-- a lovely bond of trust, with a little person's parents. That is the most important development to forge during those years.
This news is not vogue and is so off-trend. Still, I believe it is worth a think.
I did craft days and little mother co-ops a little bit, but I always called the program that my kids went to during those early years, "Mother's Pre-School."
That meant-- Going on grocery trips where they pushed little shopping carts of their own or put things from the shelves into my cart. Visiting museums and zoos without time constraint and with freedom to roam and explore. Pushing them on the swings at the park and doing lots of "underdogs". Swimming in the baby pool. Finding stop signs and fire hydrants on long stroller walks. Playing in the sand box with dinosaurs and trucks. Taking a rest with Blues Clues while sitting on my hip. Long baths with lots of bubbles and toys. Cooking or crafting their own concoctions parallel to a project I was working on. Clipping and pasting photos and cut-outs onto cardstock while I scrapbooked. Doing the dishes with me and pouring water from cup to cup. I used to tell Greg that the kids were "learning volume", with several towels on the floor to soak up the spills. Decorating cookies they they helped roll out. Bug catching at the baseball fields...that was Jaron, and for hours. Frog explorations after dark in furry pajamas. Snow suits, snowmen, and snow forts which meant putting mitten and hats on and taking them off many times a day in snowy Minnesota. Puzzles and board games...lots of board games, and the kids always beat me. Illustrating books of their own from paper we stapled. Paper airplanes and paper helicopters, that we had folded, and then launched off the balcony. Chasing the garbage truck all through the neighborhood so that we could watch those marvelous arms do their thing over and over again. Hammering nails. Holding my hand. Going to the library for story time and sitting in my lap, then watching the fish and those slimy eels in the aquarium for as long as we wanted to. Planting seeds and plants, then harvesting vegetables. Raking up the leaves and watching them toss them and roll in them. Organizing Pokemon cards together by the numbers and by the "types". Making exactly what they wanted for dinner. Walking down to Mr Newman's farm and feeding the goats all of our spoiling vegetables. Picking blueberries or black berries on a farm. Reading biographies of famous men and women and interesting historical times. Laying in bed to read storybooks at nap time and nighttime.
I like these little memories and am pleased that I have them tucked into my history. But wait a minute, kids in preschools and daycares also finger paint and read storybooks. It's true. The curriculum in what I called "Mother's Preschool" was similar to formal preschools. I think that Mr Neufeld would say that the difference is about the developmental needs of a child from 0-5 years old. He/she is working at learning emotional intimacy and trust, and that is best developed at home with "the adult that will raise him/her". If I understand Mr Neufeld right, the charm and importance in what I described above was the not about the activities, as much as it was about WHO the child was doing them with. interesting. A mother (and father) love the child, have interest in him long-term, are endowed with patience and love and loyalty that no provider can match, and have a divine commission to do so It's about love. It's the love and loyalty that develops "emotional intimacy", "safety", "continuity", and "deep connections" that Mr Neufeld is advocating. All of those learning experiences have the most value when they are developing security and trust with someone who is in it for the long haul. It is doing those things with a parent who will be along for the ride for years and years to come.
I think that it's ok to reject society's pull into pre-schooler learning programs as essential to a child's development. God sent these kids to you and to me, and we, with His help, are enough. In fact, better than enough, Dr Neufeld says that just a plain old mom, her time, and her love is exactly what the pre-schooler needs.








